by Alex Crocker
Were you spanked as a child? According to one 2006 survey, 75% of American parents believe that spanking is a necessary form of discipline. In some areas, corporal punishment goes beyond the home—there were 5,245 incidents of corporal punishment in Florida schools last year alone.
Is there a scientific justification for spanking and other forms of corporal punishment, or are such methods used by parents and teachers because they have lost faith in their ability to protect, control, and discipline children without reverting to violent measures?
In the psychological field of operant conditioning, spanking is considered a form of positive punishment; it decreases unwanted behavior by administering an adverse stimulus (Meyers, 2007). Theoretically, then, spanking a child after he or she misbehaves should prevent the behavior from recurring. But studies show that spanking suppresses violent behavior rather than stopping it altogether. While mild and occasional spanking has not proven significantly harmful to children, it still fails to teach them a better alternative to their bad behavior.
Positive reinforcement—in which parents and teachers give praise for good behavior—seems to be the better alternative, but this method can also backfire. When children receive too much praise, they loose their intrinsic desire to do well, and get less enjoyment out of the over-praised action or activity. According to child researcher Alfie Kohn, overused positive reinforcement can also cause children to believe that their parents’ love is conditional on their success—doubtless a troubling consequence in the minds of many unconditionally loving parents.
So what is an overworked, stressed-out parent to do? Researcher Robert Larzelere has shown that positive punishment, such as spanking, can increase violence in children lower their self-esteem, but that it may be effective as a backup method when other forms of discipline—such as time-outs and reasoning—don’t work. According to others in the field, such as Murray Straus, co-director of the Family Research Laboratory at the University of New Hampshire, spanking works, but is a morally unjust form of punishment that should not be allowed to continue.
Ultimately, decisions about spanking are reserved for parents, and in some states, teachers. Given recent studies on operant conditioning, it appears that corporal punishment—when used as a last resort—may not be harmful, but the risks associated with this method are far greater than those related to its alternative: positive reinforcement.
[Editor's note: While praise and punishments certainly are a part of guidance and discipline, I would hate for readers to get the impression that good parenting consists of reacting to what children do. Another view is to think of parenting as mostly a proactive process, anticipating potential difficulties and guiding children through them. This approach is described in this article from the University of Missouri Extension.]
Reference
Myers, D. G. (2007) Psychology in Modules (8th ed.). New York: Worth.
I thought spanking were considered negitative not positive punishment.
Comment by TheDeeZone — March 12, 2008 @ 12:32 pm
I know it seems counter intuitive, but in the field of psychology positive punishment refers to the addition (hence, the positive) of an aversive stimulus or activity as opposed to negative punishment which is the removal (hence the negative) of a desirable activity or stimuli.
Comment by Jessica — October 16, 2009 @ 7:50 am
The language of conditioning can be confusing, but Alex has it right.
In the language of operant conditioning, “positive” means an added response to the behavior. When that response is rewarding, it is positive reinforcement. When that response is aversive, it is positive punishment.
In this language, “negative” means taking something away in response to the behavior. Negative reinforcement would be taking away something unpleasant (so the behavior increases), while negative punishment would be taking away something nice (so the behavior decreases).
Spanking is intended as an aversive consequence, that should reduce the behavior that triggered it. Thus it is positive punishment.
Comment by intro2psych — March 12, 2008 @ 4:14 pm
Yeah, I remembered that after I posted my comment. It is has been a long time since I took B-Mod
Comment by TheDeeZone — March 12, 2008 @ 4:38 pm
This article reminded me of a conversation I had with several friends during a high school sleepover. In response to one friend’s nightmarish babysitting story (her two pre-school aged charges stripped naked and hid a bit too effectively during a game of hide and seek; they hadn’t actually been found yet when their parents returned home), another replied that they ought to have been given a spanking. The babysitter was shocked by this suggestion and insisted that she would never hurt a child. A third friend commented that she’d been spanked as a child and didn’t believe herself any worse off for having had the experience. Both teenaged spanking advocates believed that they had deserved the punishment.
This debate is particularly interesting when one considers psychologist Alice Miller’s warning in a “manifesto” entitled “Every Smack is a Humiliation” that researchers have “proven” childhood spankings to be detrimental to one’s adult “character” and conduct (http://www.alice-miller.com/flyers_en.php?page=1). Miller goes so far as to suggest that the atrocious behavior of Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, and Mao Zedong resulted from corporal punishment during their formative years (http://www.alice-miller.com/flyers_en.php?page=1).
I believe that Miller has committed an extreme over-simplification of these issues. I consider all three of the aforementioned girls to be uncommonly empathetic and socially confident. They have all enjoyed academic success and none have adopted the self-destructive, stereo-typically “teenage” behaviors of drug use, alcohol abuse, or extreme dieting. All are generally up-beat, claim to be close to their families and believe that, overall, their parents have done a pretty good job. Family dynamics are complex and punishment is a single component of parenting. Whether or not spanking is an appropriate method of punishment may depend on the context in which it is used, meaning how consistent it is with an individual family’s overall value system.
Comment by Psych 105 Student — April 8, 2008 @ 4:38 pm
I written about negative versus positive punishments and 5 effective punishment a few months ago.
I agree that with spanking, we model that using violence is the correct way to get what we want.
As our actions speak louder as our words, the children will stay violent (Thye might suppress it temporary, or when the parents are
present.) I am surprised 75% of the american parents see spanking as a good think. I have no number but I’m pretty sure in Belgium it is much, much less.
Comment by paircoaching — May 6, 2008 @ 12:55 pm
[...] I’m bigger on discipline (raising my voice, taking toys away, etc.) than is my wife, but I’ve never been keen on using physical force. I’ve never ruled it out (see Miz Pink’s post “Beat Down” because I agree with her 95% on that post) but I don’t like it, and there are other people in the blogosphere who have spoken eloquently on the pitfalls and uses of corporal punishment (Blackgirlinmaine recently in her Spare the Rod… post, a more light-hearted one at this blog, and a more academic take here.) [...]
Pingback by The Hand That Flew « Holy Shit from Deacon Blue — July 18, 2008 @ 3:49 pm